Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics

Papers
(The TQCC of Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Imperfective aspect underspecified for number: Evidence from an eye-tracking during reading experiment15
Final tensing and opacity in Podhale Goralian13
Mandarin Chinese peer advice online: a study of gender disparity10
Polgem – The recorded corpus of Polish geminate consonants6
Aspects of pitch in textsetting: a suprasegmental analysis of two Turkish versions of Franz Schubert’s Ellens Gesang III (D. 839)4
Investigating foreign language anxiety of Chinese Dongxiang ethnic group: a language conflict perspective4
Introduction to the special issue4
Case-mismatching versus D-linking of ATB wh-questions in Korean4
Note from Guest Editors3
The intervention effect in suzhounese polar questions3
Frontmatter3
A different kind of phrasal comparatives with a non-transformational Schönfinkelization in semantic composition: the case of Jordanian Arabic3
The syntax of two existential unaccusative verbs in Polish3
The interpretation of urbanonyms in discourse: Reconciling theoretical accounts with experimental results2
The role of lexical context and language experience in the perception of foreign-accented segments2
Fragment questions in Chinese: At the syntax-pragmatics interface2
Local identity avoidance and reflexivity2
The pragmatics of ‘it is well’ in Nigerian English2
Metrically-conditioned high vowel syncope in Najdi Arabic2
Frontmatter1
Infinitival clauses with dative subjects: goal-oriented directedness in space and time1
How does interpreting training affect the executive function of switching? A longitudinal EEG-study of task switching1
From experiencer verbs to Agree-and-Move: a review of Bind Me Tender, Bind Me Do!1
Active verbs with inanimate, text-denoting subjects in Polish and English abstracts of research articles in linguistics1
‘I would never…’: Deictic shift and moralizing in anti-immigration reader comments1
On the syntax and pragmatics of the ‘why + not + XP’ construction: a cartographic approach1
Evaluating the phylogenetic signal of morphosyntax1
Frontmatter1
‘Leftover women’: A sociolinguistic study of gender bias in Chinese1
“Mapping and projecting otherness in media discourse of the Russia–Ukraine war”1
Investigating the effects of late sign language acquisition on referent introduction: a follow-up study1
Frontmatter1
Parasitic gap patterns and hierarchy preservation in German1
Cognitive translation and interpreting studies – an evolving research area and a thriving community of practice1
Discourse function of personal pronouns in a slavic pro-drop language: Evidence from Croatian L1 argumentative writing1
Croatian (mor)phonotactic word-medial consonant clusters in the early lexicon1
Can L2 learners acquire native-like typicality representation in categorization?1
English loan translations in Polish in the area of computers: Syntactic aspects1
Licensing Case-mismatches and dependent plural markers in Korean left-node-raising1
A tale of two tool(kit)s: from canonical antonymy to non-canonical opposition in the Qur’anic discourse1
L2 rhythm production and musical rhythm perception in advanced learners of English1
Formulaic language in oral academic discourse socialization of graduate students in a Northern Cyprus university1
The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Jordanian Arabic1
Impacts of working memory, L2 proficiency, and cognitive flexibility on cross-domain structural priming1
From verb to epistemic marker: bini in Hamedanian Persian1
Verb-noun compounds versus synthetic compounds in English, German and Italian1
A probability distribution of dependencies in interlanguage1
Can cultural distance be a factor in bilingual processing? Report from primed translation recognition task of Rongmei–Meitei bilinguals1
Are Polish “DLA” and “KU” really synonymic purposive prepositions?1
0.078131198883057