Policy and Internet

Papers
(The TQCC of Policy and Internet is 8. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
The client net state: Trajectories of state control over cyberspace61
Digital currencies, monetary sovereignty, and U.S.–China power competition45
33
Rage or rationality: Exposure to Internet censorship and the impact on individual information behaviors in China28
National markets in a world of global platform giants: The persistence of Russian domestic competitors28
Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance26
Location, Location, Reaction: How Mandatory IP Disclosure Silences Critics and Sparks Backlash25
Issue Information24
Experts React—The Politics of Technology in Trump's Second Term23
Where are the ethical guidelines? Examining the governance of digital technologies and AI in Nigeria19
Accepting but not engaging with it: Digital participation in local government‐run social credit systems in China17
SAVE YOUR INTERNET! The persuasion work of YouTube in the controversy over EU's digital market directive17
Producing entrepreneurial citizens: Governmentality over and through Hong Kong influencers onXiaohongshu (Red)17
Data justice in the “twin objective” of market and risk: How discrimination is formulated in EU's AI policy16
The political origins of platform economy regulations. Understanding variations in governing Airbnb and Uber across cities in Switzerland16
The Multiple Streams Framework: A Lens for Understanding Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Public Sector16
Regulating social media and influencers within Vietnam15
Countering online terrorist content: A social regulation approach15
Watering down the wine: European Union regulation of violent right‐wing extremism content and the securitisation of new online spaces15
Unthinking Digital Sovereignty: A Critical Reflection on Origins, Objectives, and Practices15
Oegugin Influencers and pop nationalism through government campaigns: Regulating foreign‐nationals in the South Korean YouTube ecology14
The success of e‐participation. Learning lessons from Decide Madrid and We asked, You said, We did in Scotland14
Do fake online comments pose a threat to regulatory policymaking? Evidence from Internet regulation in the United States14
Special issue: The (international) politics of content takedowns: Theory, practice, ethics13
Withdrawn: Power Relationships in China's Internet Governance13
Issue Information13
Content takedowns and activist organizing: Impact of social media content moderation on activists and organizing13
Social media governance and strategies to combat online hatespeech in Germany13
12
The (complex) effect of internet voting on turnout: Theoretical and methodological considerations12
The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy11
Shedding light on transparency: A comprehensive study of state‐level transparency portals in Mexico10
Issue Information10
Issue Information10
Australian Teen Voices on Age Verification and Age Assurance Measures10
NetzDG on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Stakeholders in Public Discourse About Platform Regulation in Germany10
Issue Information10
Pathways to Safeguarding Digital Sovereignty Within a Multi‐Level Governance Framework: A Cross‐National Comparative Study Based on the FsQCA Method10
Geopolitics in Platform Governance: Algorithmic Sovereignty and Data Localization in China and the United States9
Platform governance by competing systems of political economy: The United States and China9
9
Issue Information9
The unjust burden of digital inclusion for low‐income migrant parents9
An exploratory study of social media's role in facilitating public participation in e‐rulemaking using computational text analysis tools9
Ghosts of YouTube: Rules and conventions in Japanese YouTube content creation outsourcing8
Democracy in the digital era8
A Teleological Interpretation of the Definition of DeepFakes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act—A Purpose‐Based Approach to Potential Problems With the Word “Existing”8
“Dual‐Track” platform governance on content: A comparative study between China and United States8
Regulating Zhibo in China: Exploring multiple levels of self‐regulation and stakeholder dynamics8
Issue Information8
0.13652801513672