Policy and Internet

Papers
(The TQCC of Policy and Internet is 8. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Digital currencies, monetary sovereignty, and U.S.–China power competition111
The client net state: Trajectories of state control over cyberspace71
National markets in a world of global platform giants: The persistence of Russian domestic competitors53
Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance41
Rage or rationality: Exposure to Internet censorship and the impact on individual information behaviors in China39
From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok33
Issue Information32
Accepting but not engaging with it: Digital participation in local government‐run social credit systems in China29
Consumer IoT and its under‐regulation: Findings from an Australian study28
Where are the ethical guidelines? Examining the governance of digital technologies and AI in Nigeria28
Producing entrepreneurial citizens: Governmentality over and through Hong Kong influencers onXiaohongshu (Red)25
Data justice in the “twin objective” of market and risk: How discrimination is formulated in EU's AI policy23
The political origins of platform economy regulations. Understanding variations in governing Airbnb and Uber across cities in Switzerland21
Procedural rights as safeguard for human rights in platform regulation21
Watering down the wine: European Union regulation of violent right‐wing extremism content and the securitisation of new online spaces18
SAVE YOUR INTERNET! The persuasion work of YouTube in the controversy over EU's digital market directive18
Oegugin Influencers and pop nationalism through government campaigns: Regulating foreign‐nationals in the South Korean YouTube ecology17
Do fake online comments pose a threat to regulatory policymaking? Evidence from Internet regulation in the United States16
Regulating social media and influencers within Vietnam15
Countering online terrorist content: A social regulation approach15
The success of e‐participation. Learning lessons from Decide Madrid and We asked, You said, We did in Scotland15
Unthinking Digital Sovereignty: A Critical Reflection on Origins, Objectives, and Practices15
Rethinking the legal regulation of Internet platform monopoly in China15
Special issue: The (international) politics of content takedowns: Theory, practice, ethics14
Social media governance and strategies to combat online hatespeech in Germany13
Issue Information13
Shedding light on transparency: A comprehensive study of state‐level transparency portals in Mexico13
Withdrawn: Power Relationships in China's Internet Governance12
12
Content takedowns and activist organizing: Impact of social media content moderation on activists and organizing12
The (complex) effect of internet voting on turnout: Theoretical and methodological considerations12
The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy12
Pathways to Safeguarding Digital Sovereignty Within a Multi‐Level Governance Framework: A Cross‐National Comparative Study Based on the FsQCA Method11
Issue Information11
A process model of the public sphere: A case of municipal policy debates on Sina Weibo11
NetzDG on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Stakeholders in Public Discourse About Platform Regulation in Germany10
Issue Information10
Issue Information10
An exploratory study of social media's role in facilitating public participation in e‐rulemaking using computational text analysis tools9
The unjust burden of digital inclusion for low‐income migrant parents9
Platform governance by competing systems of political economy: The United States and China9
9
Ghosts of YouTube: Rules and conventions in Japanese YouTube content creation outsourcing9
Democracy in the digital era8
“Dual‐Track” platform governance on content: A comparative study between China and United States8
Issue Information8
Regulating Zhibo in China: Exploring multiple levels of self‐regulation and stakeholder dynamics8
Digitally skilled or digitally competent? Evaluating the impact of e‐Facilitation on young volunteers in Italy8
A Teleological Interpretation of the Definition of DeepFakes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act—A Purpose‐Based Approach to Potential Problems With the Word “Existing”8
Geopolitics in Platform Governance: Algorithmic Sovereignty and Data Localization in China and the United States8
0.087671041488647