Policy and Internet

Papers
(The TQCC of Policy and Internet is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-05-01 to 2025-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
The client net state: Trajectories of state control over cyberspace87
Digital currencies, monetary sovereignty, and U.S.–China power competition55
Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance45
Rage or rationality: Exposure to Internet censorship and the impact on individual information behaviors in China36
National markets in a world of global platform giants: The persistence of Russian domestic competitors32
From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok25
Producing entrepreneurial citizens: Governmentality over and through Hong Kong influencers onXiaohongshu (Red)25
Accepting but not engaging with it: Digital participation in local government‐run social credit systems in China24
Where are the ethical guidelines? Examining the governance of digital technologies and AI in Nigeria24
Research themes in big data analytics for policymaking: Insights from a mixed‐methods systematic literature review22
Issue Information22
Consumer IoT and its under‐regulation: Findings from an Australian study21
Procedural rights as safeguard for human rights in platform regulation18
SAVE YOUR INTERNET! The persuasion work of YouTube in the controversy over EU's digital market directive18
17
Data justice in the “twin objective” of market and risk: How discrimination is formulated in EU's AI policy16
The political origins of platform economy regulations. Understanding variations in governing Airbnb and Uber across cities in Switzerland16
Unthinking Digital Sovereignty: A Critical Reflection on Origins, Objectives, and Practices15
Countering online terrorist content: A social regulation approach14
Regulating social media and influencers within Vietnam12
Watering down the wine: European Union regulation of violent right‐wing extremism content and the securitisation of new online spaces12
Rethinking the legal regulation of Internet platform monopoly in China12
Oegugin Influencers and pop nationalism through government campaigns: Regulating foreign‐nationals in the South Korean YouTube ecology12
The success of e‐participation. Learning lessons from Decide Madrid and We asked, You said, We did in Scotland12
Social media governance and strategies to combat online hatespeech in Germany12
Do fake online comments pose a threat to regulatory policymaking? Evidence from Internet regulation in the United States12
Shedding light on transparency: A comprehensive study of state‐level transparency portals in Mexico11
Special issue: The (international) politics of content takedowns: Theory, practice, ethics11
Issue Information10
The pursuit of ‘good’ Internet policy10
The (complex) effect of internet voting on turnout: Theoretical and methodological considerations10
Content takedowns and activist organizing: Impact of social media content moderation on activists and organizing10
Withdrawn: Power Relationships in China's Internet Governance9
Issue Information9
Issue Information9
9
A process model of the public sphere: A case of municipal policy debates on Sina Weibo9
Platform governance by competing systems of political economy: The United States and China9
An exploratory study of social media's role in facilitating public participation in e‐rulemaking using computational text analysis tools8
Issue Information8
7
Regulating Zhibo in China: Exploring multiple levels of self‐regulation and stakeholder dynamics7
The unjust burden of digital inclusion for low‐income migrant parents7
Ghosts of YouTube: Rules and conventions in Japanese YouTube content creation outsourcing7
A Teleological Interpretation of the Definition of DeepFakes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act—A Purpose‐Based Approach to Potential Problems With the Word “Existing”7
“Dual‐Track” platform governance on content: A comparative study between China and United States7
Blame and obligation: The importance of libertarianism and political orientation in the public assessment of disinformation in the United States6
Repackaging and Repurposing Digital Objects: A Conceptual Model to Understand the Malleability of Politics in Digital Environments6
The responsibility to protect online: Lessons from R2P and the politics of Western‐Centricity in online harms regulation6
Democracy in the digital era6
Can Facebook's community standards keep up with legal certainty? Content moderation governance under the pressure of the Digital Services Act6
Digitally skilled or digitally competent? Evaluating the impact of e‐Facilitation on young volunteers in Italy6
Issue Information6
Issue Information6
0.046389102935791