International Data Privacy Law

Papers
(The median citation count of International Data Privacy Law is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
The conflict between China’s restrictions on cross-border data transfer and US discovery of evidence28
Applying GDPR roles and responsibilities to scientific data sharing12
Resisting to the Sirens’ Song: a compact and feasible framework for commercial spyware regulation9
The constitutionality of the new Indian CERT-In VPN rules9
A cross-cultural analysis of transparency: the interplay of law, privacy policies, and user perceptions9
Theory and practice: the protection of children’s personal information in China9
Reforming the Australian Framework for International Data Sharing9
Intermediating data rights exercises: the role of legal mandates9
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Data protection in the judiciary in EU and EEA Member States8
Some parting remarks, with a hopeful glance towards the future8
Complying with the GDPR when vulnerable people use smart devices8
Access to public information and personal data protection: how do they dialogue?7
The interplay between machine learning and data minimization under the GDPR: the case of Google’s topics API7
The Brussels effect(s) and the rise of a privacy profession7
Correction to: The conflict between China’s restrictions on cross-border data transfer and US discovery of evidence7
Teachers in the loop? An analysis of automatic assessment systems under Article 22 GDPR6
A pragmatic compromise? The role of Article 88 GDPR in upholding privacy in the workplace6
Artificial intelligence in health care: data protection concerns in Malaysia5
Transferring personal data to international organizations under the GDPR: an analysis of the transfer mechanisms4
It is time to recognize the tort of invasion of privacy in Malaysia4
Protection of genomic data and the Australian Privacy Act: when are genomic data ‘personal information’?4
Correction to: Revisiting the definition of health data in the age of digitalized health care4
Unpacking data: China’s ‘bundle of rights’ approach to the commercialization of data3
Is that a fully automated decision? Comparing ADM regulation under EU and Brazil’s data protection law3
The concept of international health research adequacy decisions3
Data protection in the BRICS countries: legal interoperability through innovative practices and convergence3
Comparing smart city data protection approaches: digital consent and the accountability framework in Singapore3
Carissa Véliz, Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data3
The one-stop-shop and the European Data Protection Board’s role in combatting data supervision forum shopping3
The Metaverse: searching for compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation2
Chronicling GDPR Transparency Rights in Practice: The Good, the Bad and the Challenges Ahead2
The diffusion of a U.S. trade-based approach to international personal data transfers and its implications for national data privacy regulations2
On proportionality in the data protection jurisprudence of the CJEU2
Genometric data privacy within the ECHR regime2
Revisiting the definition of health data in the age of digitalized health care2
GDPR codes of conduct and their (extra)territorial features: a tale of two systems1
Entering the next phase1
Code as personal data: implications for data protection law and regulation of algorithms1
An idea of inclusive and representative consent framework: bringing data subjects to data protection discourse1
The third country problem under the GDPR: enhancing protection of data transfers with technology1
International Transfers: Johnson v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] and Diplomatic Missions1
Australian privacy law, extraterritoriality, and regulating data collected by offshore direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies1
Personal data protection enforcement under GDPR—the Slovak experience1
Simple and advanced reflexivity in GDPR enforcement: empirical evidence from DPA activity1
Putting a price on data protection infringement1
0.024874925613403