Research & Politics

Papers
(The TQCC of Research & Politics is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
What Drives Support for Armed Humanitarian Intervention? Experimental Evidence From Dutch Citizens on International Law and Probability of Success22
Protest and digital adaptation22
Photo identification laws and perceptions of electoral fraud20
Persuading climate skeptics with facts: Effects of causal evidence vs. consensus messaging18
Sticks and carrots for peace: The effect of manipulative mediation strategies on post-conflict stability18
The uses for fire data and satellite images in monitoring, detecting, and documenting collective political violence15
Conspiratorial thinking in the Latino community on the 2020 election15
Assessing survey mode effects in the 2019 EP elections: A comparison of online and face-to-face-survey data from six European countries15
Gender stereotypes and petty corruption among street-level bureaucrats: Evidence from a conjoint experiment12
Domestic constraints in crisis bargaining12
Does affective empathy capacity condition individual variation in support for military escalation? Evidence from a survey vignette11
Worldviews, attitudes to science and science policy in Kuwait: The engagement and mobilisation effects11
Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in U.S. elections11
Anomalous responses on Amazon Mechanical Turk: An Indian perspective10
Dealing with measurement error in list experiments: Choosing the right control list design10
Arab identity and attitudes toward migration in Kuwait and Qatar9
Voting experience in a new era: The impact of past eligibility on the breakdown of mainstream parties9
Replicating the literature on prefecture-level meritocratic promotion in China9
Do norm-based appeals affect the acceptance of the singular use of they/them pronouns?8
Corrigendum: Do TJ policies cause backlash? Evidence from street name changes in Spain8
Constructing generalizable geographic natural experiments8
Authoritarianism and support for Trump and Clinton in the 2016 primaries7
Does war improve women’s political representation?7
Russian adventurism and Central Asian leaders’ foreign policy rhetoric: Evidence from the UN General Debate corpus6
After the ballot box: How explicit racist appeals damage constituents views of their representation in government6
Economic shocks and militant formation6
Getting a Seat at the Table: Changes in Military Participation in Government and Coups6
Standing with Ukraine? How citizens trade off self-interest and principles in supporting war-torn international partners5
Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text5
The impact of real world information shocks on political attitudes: Evidence from the Panama Papers disclosures5
New evidence reveals curvilinear relationship between levels of democracy and deforestation5
From masks to mismanagement: A global assessment of the rise and fall of pandemic-related protests4
Politician responses to material incentives for participation in surveys: Experimental evidence from South Africa4
Entering the “foxhole”: Partisan media priming and the application of racial justice in America4
The (null) effects of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on Europeans’ attitudes toward democracy4
Let presidents fail: Congressional deference to presidents as gambling on failure4
Are courts “different?” Experimental evidence on the unique costs of attacking courts4
Stand up and be counted: Using traffic cameras to assess voting behavior in real time4
Partisan news versus party cues: The effect of cross-cutting party and partisan network cues on polarization and persuasion4
Legitimate questions: Public perceptions of the legitimacy of US presidential election outcomes4
Partisanship and the trolley problem: Partisan willingness to sacrifice members of the other party4
Does polygyny cause intergroup conflict? Re-examining Koos and Neupert-Wentz (2020)4
Spelling correction with large language models to reduce measurement error in open-ended survey responses4
Double penalty? How candidate class and gender influence voter evaluations4
Do they really care? Social desirability bias in attitudes towards corruption4
Introducing the MMAD Repressive Actors Dataset4
Rents, refugees, and the populist radical right3
Self-coding: A method to assess semantic validity and bias when coding open-ended responses3
Public support for assistance for workers displaced by technology3
How do Americans want elections to be run during the COVID-19 crisis?3
Feminism within parties: Implications for political elite evaluations and policy attitudes3
Do long constitutions really hamper economic performance? A comment on Tsebelis and Nardi (2016a)3
Transfer learning for topic labeling: Analysis of the UK House of Commons speeches 1935–20143
Do political finance reforms really reduce corruption? A replication study3
Muslim bias or fear of fundamentalism? A survey experiment in five Western European democracies3
Vote-by-mail policy and the 2020 presidential election3
Inexperienced or anti-establishment? Voter preferences for outsider congressional candidates3
How do gender stereotypes about leadership positions change in the face of a crisis?3
What explains election-driven family conflicts?3
Machine-learning applications to authoritarian selections: The case of China3
Clarifying the mediation dilemma: A response to “Sticks and carrots for peace”3
PACs and January 6th: Campaign finance and objections to the Electoral College vote count3
Do sexual minorities participate more in politics?3
0.053345918655396