Research & Politics

Papers
(The TQCC of Research & Politics is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Domestic constraints in crisis bargaining59
Russian adventurism and Central Asian leaders’ foreign policy rhetoric: Evidence from the UN General Debate corpus42
Reevaluating ideological asymmetries in specific support for the Supreme Court32
Corrigendum: Do TJ policies cause backlash? Evidence from street name changes in Spain26
New evidence reveals curvilinear relationship between levels of democracy and deforestation23
Voting experience in a new era: The impact of past eligibility on the breakdown of mainstream parties21
The uses for fire data and satellite images in monitoring, detecting, and documenting collective political violence19
Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in U.S. elections19
Public perceptions of local influence13
Xenophobic violence in Sweden 2009–2022: Introducing the dataset13
What explains election-driven family conflicts?12
Legitimate questions: Public perceptions of the legitimacy of US presidential election outcomes12
Rents, refugees, and the populist radical right10
Stand up and be counted: Using traffic cameras to assess voting behavior in real time10
Bureaucracy and policymaking: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis9
Words that matter: A machine learning analysis of United Nations General Assembly speeches and their influence on aid allocation9
New data, new results? How data sources and vintages affect the replicability of research9
The electoral consequences of policy-making in coalition governments9
Descriptive representation and attitudes about local government: An experimental test using real-world stimuli9
Fundraising on the fringe: Do ideologically extreme candidates solicit small donations?9
Mind the context! The role of theoretical concepts for analyzing legislative text data8
Women’s descriptive representation and support for the inclusion of gender-related provisions in trade agreements8
Stability and change in the opinion–policy relationship: Evidence from minimum wage laws7
Does sports success increase government support? Voter (ir)rationality in a multiparty context7
Do they really believe that? Measuring salient conspiracy endorsement7
What do Germans of Russian and Turkish migration background think about sanctions against Russia?6
The unexpected results of the peace referendum changed conflict termination preferences in Colombia6
Political trust and public support for propaganda in China6
Gender stereotypes and petty corruption among street-level bureaucrats: Evidence from a conjoint experiment6
Entitled and self-conscious? The ego-centric underpinnings of electoral preferences during the 2020 U.S. election6
Reducing affective polarization does not affect false news sharing or truth discernment6
Do AIs know what the most important issue is? Using language models to code open-text social survey responses at scale6
Corruption next door, satisfaction at home: Spillover effects of corruption on political trust in China6
Introducing the trust in government (TrustGov) dataset: A new resource for cross-national time-series trust research6
Political shock and international students: Estimating the “Trump effect”6
Understanding public attitudes toward restrictive voting laws in the United States6
Does affective empathy capacity condition individual variation in support for military escalation? Evidence from a survey vignette6
Corrigendum to “An incomplete recipe: One-dimensional latent variables do not capture the full flavor of democratic support”5
Authoritarianism and support for Trump and Clinton in the 2016 primaries5
From masks to mismanagement: A global assessment of the rise and fall of pandemic-related protests5
What’s woke? Ordinary Americans’ understandings of wokeness5
The use of confirmation and refutation frames in fact-checking war-related misinformation5
Feminism within parties: Implications for political elite evaluations and policy attitudes5
Detecting pro-kremlin disinformation using large language models5
Changing the lens: The contingency of results from conjoint experiments on the outcome variable and the estimand5
Machine-learning applications to authoritarian selections: The case of China5
Using MI-LASSO to study populist radical right voting in times of pandemic5
Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science4
Unexpected, but consistent and pre-registered: Experimental evidence on interview language and Latino views of COVID-194
Do political finance reforms really reduce corruption? A replication study4
Are courts “different?” Experimental evidence on the unique costs of attacking courts4
Does polygyny cause intergroup conflict? Re-examining Koos and Neupert-Wentz (2020)4
Did you hear about Clarence Thomas? Measuring public attention toward the Supreme Court4
Entering the “foxhole”: Partisan media priming and the application of racial justice in America4
Between home turf and Hinterland: Directly elected MPs focus more on local and deprived places than list candidates on social media4
Why programmatic parties reduce criminal violence: Theory and evidence from Brazil4
Armed conflict as a threat to social cohesion: Large-scale displacement and its short- and long-term effects on in-group perceptions4
The effect of party identification and party cues on populist attitudes4
Distributive politics as behavioral localism: Evidence from a vignette experiment in Hungary4
0.064779996871948