Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Papers
(The TQCC of Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science is 11. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
A Response to a Comment on Hall et al. (2024)286
A Tutorial on Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformal Prediction188
Effects of Psychological Distance on Mental Abstraction: A Registered Report of Four Tests of Construal-Level Theory139
Corrigendum: Impossible Hypotheses and Effect-Size Limits122
From the Illusion of Choice to Actual Control: Reconsidering the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance100
Dissonance in the Induced-Compliance Paradigm: A Commentary on Vaidis et al. (2024)83
Fast-Track Your Abstract Screening: Mastering ASReview for Accelerating Abstract Screening and Evaluating Decisions From Automatic-Screening Methods82
Beyond Statistical Myopia: Replying to a Misguided Critique of Mind–Body Research72
Data Collection in Multimodal Language and Communication Research: A Flexible Decision Framework62
Language Models Accurately Infer Correlations Between Psychological Items and Scales From Text Alone53
A Primer for Evaluating Large Language Models in Social-Science Research53
The Social-Relations Model for Asymmetric-Block-Design Data: A Tutorial With R44
How Do Psychology Journals Handle Postpublication Critique? A Cross-Sectional Study of Policy and Practice41
Noise Versus Signal: What Can One Conclude When a Classic Finding Fails to Replicate?33
An Inception-Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies Are Publicly Shared33
Can Results-Blind Selection Improve Science Communication?32
Advancing Group-Based Disparities Research and Beyond: A Cautionary Note on Selection Bias31
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients Into Clear Quantities30
Reproducibility of Published Meta-Analyses on Clinical-Psychological Interventions29
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Completeness of Preregistrations by Psychological Authors From German-Speaking Institutions29
Performing Small-Telescopes Analysis by Resampling: Empirically Constructing Confidence Intervals and Estimating Statistical Power for Measures of Effect Size29
Implementing Statcheck During Peer Review Is Related to a Steep Decline in Statistical-Reporting Inconsistencies27
ARIADNE: A Scientific Navigator to Find Your Way Through the Resource Labyrinth of Psychological Sciences26
One Decade Into the Replication Crisis, How Have Psychological Results Changed?26
Corrigendum to “Do Musicians Have Better Short-Term Memory Than Nonmusicians? A Multilab Study”26
Beyond the Mean: Can We Improve the Predictive Power of Psychometric Scales?26
Realizing the Full Potential of Big-Team Behavioral Science: How Global Collaborations Can Benefit From Participatory Open-Research Practices24
Evaluating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Study Preregistration in the Undergraduate Dissertation23
iCatcher+: Robust and Automated Annotation of Infants’ and Young Children’s Gaze Behavior From Videos Collected in Laboratory, Field, and Online Studies22
These Are Not the Effects You Are Looking for: Causality and the Within-/Between-Persons Distinction in Longitudinal Data Analysis22
Google-Search Data for Psychological Scientists: A Tutorial and Best Practices21
Best Laid Plans: A Guide to Reporting Preregistration Deviations21
Do Musicians Have Better Short-Term Memory Than Nonmusicians? A Multilab Study20
Bayesian Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance: An Updated Methodology Implemented in JASP20
Does Your Smartphone “Know” Your Social Life? A Methodological Comparison of Day Reconstruction, Experience Sampling, and Mobile Sensing19
Practices in Data-Quality Evaluation: A Large-Scale Review of Online Survey Studies Published in 202218
Robust Evidence for Knowledge Attribution and Luck: A Comment on Hall et al. (2024)18
The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an Open Science Community From Scratch17
Journal N-Pact Factors From 2011 to 2019: Evaluating the Quality of Social/Personality Journals With Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power17
Clarifying the Choice of Confidence Intervals in Psychological Testing: A Comment on Stanley and Spence (2024)16
Methodological Refinement and Optimization in Service of Theory Specification and Development: A Commentary on Calderon et al. (2026)16
A Delphi Study to Strengthen Research-Methods Training in Undergraduate Psychology Programs15
Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions13
A Tutorial on Tailored Simulation-Based Sample-Size Planning for Experimental Designs With Generalized Linear Mixed Models13
Does Truth Pay? Investigating the Effectiveness of the Bayesian Truth Serum With an Interim Payment: A Registered Report12
Implications of the Death-Thought-Suppression-and-Rebound Assumption: Integrating the Findings of Rife et al. (2025) and Trafimow and Hughes (2012)12
One App to Rule Them All: A One-Stop Calculator and Guide for 95 Effect-Size Variants for Two-Group Comparisons of Central Tendency, Variability, Overlap, Dominance, and Distributional Tails12
Ensuring Transparency and Trust in Supervised-Machine-Learning Studies: A Checklist for Psychological Researchers11
Rethinking the Evaluation of Psychological Theories: A Commentary on Calderon et al.’s Registered Replication Report11
The Evaluation of Harm and Purity Transgressions in Africans: A Paradigmatic Replication of Rottman and Young (2019)11
Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science11
A Guide to Prototype Analyses in Cross-Cultural Research: Purpose, Advantages, and Risks11
0.12079310417175