Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Papers
(The TQCC of Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science is 10. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Effects of Psychological Distance on Mental Abstraction: A Registered Report of Four Tests of Construal-Level Theory251
A Response to a Comment on Hall et al. (2024)164
A Tutorial on Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformal Prediction125
Adjusting for Publication Bias in JASP and R: Selection Models, PET-PEESE, and Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis101
Corrigendum: Impossible Hypotheses and Effect-Size Limits81
A Primer for Evaluating Large Language Models in Social-Science Research74
From the Illusion of Choice to Actual Control: Reconsidering the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance73
Beyond Statistical Myopia: Replying to a Misguided Critique of Mind–Body Research72
Language Models Accurately Infer Correlations Between Psychological Items and Scales From Text Alone71
Dissonance in the Induced-Compliance Paradigm: A Commentary on Vaidis et al. (2024)53
The Social-Relations Model for Asymmetric-Block-Design Data: A Tutorial With R48
Fast-Track Your Abstract Screening: Mastering ASReview for Accelerating Abstract Screening and Evaluating Decisions From Automatic-Screening Methods44
How Do Psychology Journals Handle Postpublication Critique? A Cross-Sectional Study of Policy and Practice39
An Inception-Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies Are Publicly Shared38
Noise Versus Signal: What Can One Conclude When a Classic Finding Fails to Replicate?34
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients Into Clear Quantities30
Advancing Group-Based Disparities Research and Beyond: A Cautionary Note on Selection Bias28
Reproducibility of Published Meta-Analyses on Clinical-Psychological Interventions27
Can Results-Blind Selection Improve Science Communication?27
One Decade Into the Replication Crisis, How Have Psychological Results Changed?27
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Completeness of Preregistrations by Psychological Authors From German-Speaking Institutions27
Beyond the Mean: Can We Improve the Predictive Power of Psychometric Scales?25
Performing Small-Telescopes Analysis by Resampling: Empirically Constructing Confidence Intervals and Estimating Statistical Power for Measures of Effect Size25
Evaluating the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Study Preregistration in the Undergraduate Dissertation23
Implementing Statcheck During Peer Review Is Related to a Steep Decline in Statistical-Reporting Inconsistencies23
These Are Not the Effects You Are Looking for: Causality and the Within-/Between-Persons Distinction in Longitudinal Data Analysis22
Hybrid Experimental Designs for Intervention Development: What, Why, and How22
Realizing the Full Potential of Big-Team Behavioral Science: How Global Collaborations Can Benefit From Participatory Open-Research Practices21
Corrigendum to “Do Musicians Have Better Short-Term Memory Than Nonmusicians? A Multilab Study”21
ARIADNE: A Scientific Navigator to Find Your Way Through the Resource Labyrinth of Psychological Sciences20
Bayesian Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance: An Updated Methodology Implemented in JASP19
Do Musicians Have Better Short-Term Memory Than Nonmusicians? A Multilab Study19
Best Laid Plans: A Guide to Reporting Preregistration Deviations19
Google-Search Data for Psychological Scientists: A Tutorial and Best Practices18
iCatcher+: Robust and Automated Annotation of Infants’ and Young Children’s Gaze Behavior From Videos Collected in Laboratory, Field, and Online Studies17
A Delphi Study to Strengthen Research-Methods Training in Undergraduate Psychology Programs16
Robust Evidence for Knowledge Attribution and Luck: A Comment on Hall et al. (2024)15
Practices in Data-Quality Evaluation: A Large-Scale Review of Online Survey Studies Published in 202215
The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an Open Science Community From Scratch13
Journal N-Pact Factors From 2011 to 2019: Evaluating the Quality of Social/Personality Journals With Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power13
Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions12
Does Your Smartphone “Know” Your Social Life? A Methodological Comparison of Day Reconstruction, Experience Sampling, and Mobile Sensing12
Implications of the Death-Thought-Suppression-and-Rebound Assumption: Integrating the Findings of Rife et al. (2025) and Trafimow and Hughes (2012)11
Clarifying the Choice of Confidence Intervals in Psychological Testing: A Comment on Stanley and Spence (2024)11
Does Truth Pay? Investigating the Effectiveness of the Bayesian Truth Serum With an Interim Payment: A Registered Report11
A Guide to Prototype Analyses in Cross-Cultural Research: Purpose, Advantages, and Risks10
The Evaluation of Harm and Purity Transgressions in Africans: A Paradigmatic Replication of Rottman and Young (2019)10
0.09856104850769